PubMed COVID-19 Clinical Care

No abstract

No abstract

Republicans and Democrats responded in starkly different ways to the COVID-19 pandemic, from their attitudes in 2020 about whether the virus posed a threat to whether the pandemic ended in 2023. The consequences of COVID-19 for health equity has been

OBJECTIVE: Vanishing viral RNA restricts our ability to detect ancient pathogens, so, we used paleo serological approaches to trace the dynamics of the Coronavirus in ancient populations.

An 81-year-old woman undergoing B-cell depletion therapy developed COVID-19 and a hyperglycemic hyperosmotic state. She had a history of multiple vaccinations against coronaviruses but had persistent antigen positivity. Strategies to prevent the

CONCLUSIONS: To prevent outbreaks and shorten their duration, LTCFs should increase the proportion of registered nurses and single-bed rooms, and control staff infections.

CONCLUSIONS: This study explored the experiences of people with PD and their therapists by contrasting their prepandemic and in-pandemic experiences. People with PD valued telehealth access during the pandemic, but extra support was initially

CONCLUSIONS: In this study, individuals who reported PVS after covid-19 vaccination had low health status, high symptom burden, and high psychosocial stress despite trying many treatments. There is a need for continued investigation to understand and

Partisans have biased perceptions of objective conditions. At first glance, the COVID-19 pandemic would appear to be an example of this phenomenon. Noting that most citizens have consistently agreed about the pandemic, I argue that we have overlooked

The United States underperformed its potential in responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. Using original survey data from April 2020 to March 2022, we show that political partisanship may have contributed to this inconsistent response by distinguishing